TBH gonzo that was my point and thanks for the clarification.Gonzo wrote:The group that monitor castigating reporting is called 'News-Watch' and they reported that the BBCradio reporting was 'Overwhelmingly biased' against brexit in their coverage.
During the six three-hour morning shows from Monday 29 March to Saturday 4 April, Today fielded 124 guests on Article 50 but only eight, 6.5 per cent, were "given the space to make substantive arguments that the future for the UK outside the EU would yield significant benefits".
It also claimed that in the survey period BBC correspondents "displayed what can only be described as a strong common editorial bias against Brexit".
I also believe that about 70 MP's have forwarded a motion to further investigate the future of the BBC if it can't provide non biased reporting. If it's going to continue to receive public money it cant be seen to be taking sides and representing one section of the electorate.
The BBC is paid for by the public and should only report the news and not have an opinion.
If they want to invite someone to speak on a particular subject which has differing views then both sides of the coin should be represented with equal amount of time to respond.
I think we are at a point where the BBC must be challenged and if they fail to change then withdraw public funding.