Well done, senators!
Yes: PCR fraud sits at the centre of the web.
Everywhere I’ve seen the information, far too many cycles of amplification are being used.
Most people don’t know that at 40 cycles (written as Ct 40), the system has ramped up by a TRILLION FOLD the amount of genetic material in the tube.
That’s so much amplification that it’s inventor, Nobel prize winning chemist, Dr Kary Mullis, firmly recommended AGAINST use of PCR to diagnose clinical infection.
Dr Sin Lee earlier today shared the results of a study by Kaiser, a healthcare organisation. Kaiser rechecked samples from people who’d tested positive by PCR.
They used above 27 cycles vs below 27 cycles.
Turned out as I’d previously gone on about last summer & deep into autumn. The higher the Ct, the more likely that the prior positive result was false.
75% of the positive test results were false when 27+ cycles were permitted.
When fewer cycles were used to define a positive, just 5% were false (even that’s WAY too high, as 1 in 20 people given a positive result actually in error).
Now imagine a positive result being allowed after 33 cycles or 39 cycles (I believe U.K. is still using an absurd 39 cycles in PCR).
I had calculated false positives being of the order of 90%+ & 97%+, respectively.
Utterly wasteful & deliberately misleading.
Did you know that in U.K. the testing was swept out of public health labs & into newly set-up private labs?
The effect is that a tiny number of people in U.K. set the conditions under which THE most important diagnostic test ever run in the country. No one inspects them, even Govt safety people. Neither the staff nor the facilities are accredited by the body which sets quality control in these facilities.
Why does this matter? Simple: if there weren’t enough deaths to scare people, roll into “cases” by modulating PCR mass testing conditions.
This cuts across deaths statistics, because absurdly, and for the first time in medical history, a “case” is simply a positive test result even in someone with NO symptoms.
The outright misleading effects carried across to “covid19 deaths”. Most “cases” were false positive too. And these are not really deaths as a consequence of viral infection. Most of the time, the dead person in no way died because of the virus. It’s just overt lying.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://m.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakin ... 44333.html
Baaaa
