Coronavirus

[Dwayne Pipes]

https://www.swansea.ac.uk/press-office/ ... -masks.php

Don't wear them

Especially whilst swimming underwater.

[Ironworksfc]

https://www.swansea.ac.uk/press-office/ ... -masks.php

Don't wear them

Especially whilst swimming underwater.

Dr Hilary covid Jones thinks you should wear one of you are swimming in the sea, just try to keep it dry so you don't waterboard yourself.

[Ironworksfc]

Very good. A short article confirming that the people of India’s largest state, Uttar Pradesh, have responded very well to the covid19 treatment, IVERMECTIN.
Vaccination level in the Indian state, with around 2/3rd the population of the USA, is just 5% (it’s 60% in USA).
It can’t be the vaccination.
Uttar Pradesh is a crowded kind of place, so it won’t be ‘social distancing’, either.
No: Uttar Pradesh took a good look at the clinical data now available in peer reviewed journals & concluded (as anyone but a zealot would) that IVERMECTIN is safe & effective in treating covid19.
They’ve now got the state close to “Covid-free” (I always think such claims are hostages to fortune), with so few positive test results that this is no longer a top concern for public health in the Indian state.
Meanwhile, physicians in the West can be punished by striking them off, if they should dare to prescribe ivermectin.
Ivermectin is decades old, originally developed to treat parasitical disorders in human intestines, was only recently shown to be useful in farm animals. It also won a “Nobel prize” in 2015 for its human utilities , around 4,000,000,000 doses have been taken by humans & it’s on the literally short list of drugs on the WHO’s “Essential Medicines”.
So if this requires you to conclude that your TV network has been lying on your face, well, I can’t help that.
Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

https://drtrozzi.com/2021/10/ivermectin ... r-pradesh/

[jameskel]

? The orange, 2021 line. clearly runs above 2020 line, as of month 1. A bigger increase had already started in week 18

So your thought process takes you in the direction that there were minor increases at certain points before the "vaccine" rollout in that age group, but ignores the steep rise from when they got injected and all the questions of either efficacy of the jab, or detrimental effect on young people.

What the actual fuck

So how many of the increased deaths are confirmed to have had the jab?

[Ironworksfc]

So your thought process takes you in the direction that there were minor increases at certain points before the "vaccine" rollout in that age group, but ignores the steep rise from when they got injected and all the questions of either efficacy of the jab, or detrimental effect on young people.

What the actual fuck

So how many of the increased deaths are confirmed to have had the jab?

Check the PHE data and you will find out

[Ironworksfc]

So your thought process takes you in the direction that there were minor increases at certain points before the "vaccine" rollout in that age group, but ignores the steep rise from when they got injected and all the questions of either efficacy of the jab, or detrimental effect on young people.

What the actual fuck

So how many of the increased deaths are confirmed to have had the jab?

https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... n-20201201

Not available via the BBC or lack of quote function

[BlackDiamond]

So your thought process takes you in the direction that there were minor increases at certain points before the "vaccine" rollout in that age group, but ignores the steep rise from when they got injected and all the questions of either efficacy of the jab, or detrimental effect on young people.

What the actual fuck

So how many of the increased deaths are confirmed to have had the jab?

The BMJ report 84% of people admitted to hospital with confirmed C-19 were unvaccinated. Sample size 40,000

[Ironworksfc]

So how many of the increased deaths are confirmed to have had the jab?

The BMJ report 84% of people admitted to hospital with confirmed C-19 were unvaccinated. Sample size 40,000

How does that compare to the PHE figures of those who have died who were "vaccinated" ?

[BlackDiamond]

The BMJ report 84% of people admitted to hospital with confirmed C-19 were unvaccinated. Sample size 40,000

How does that compare to the PHE figures of those who have died who were "vaccinated" ?

It's different because the British Medical Journal has editorial freedom from the BMA. And because it's Peer reviewed it's undiluted by association influence.

[Ironworksfc]

How does that compare to the PHE figures of those who have died who were "vaccinated" ?

It's different because the British Medical Journal has editorial freedom from the BMA. And because it's Peer reviewed it's undiluted by association influence.

Sort of missed the point that BD, it was deaths that were being discussed, not hospitalisations. Next you're going to bore me to death with the pointless total cases statistics