Page 3 of 3
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 12:36 pm
by Castiron
Salah or Lingard for me, not because of my claret glasses, but purely for the build up, Coufal, back heel by Fornals and the finish was quite excellent.
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 1:07 pm
by only1salty
Lanzini - last minute, against Spuds, after them being 3 up.
Fucking beautiful
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 2:58 pm
by h69
JayK wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:59 am
h69 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:28 am
I don't think it was goal of the season but I also don't think Lanzini's was either...both good goals....I assume though that it was the public voting.
If I had to vote for it, I would have picked Salah's goal against us.
His 1st touch was sickeningly good
Yes. Like Fornals as mentioned above, he killed the ball dead but the fact that they broke so quickly as well won it for me.
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:03 am
by Flairon
Whiskyman wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 12:24 pm
Flairon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:57 am
I am not saying it is rigged, but are you seriously asking that question. After all, where there is a will; there is a way...
I take your point. But seriously why would anyone bother?
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:04 am
by palerider
Flairon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:03 am
Whiskyman wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 12:24 pm
I take your point. But seriously why would anyone bother?
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
Let's be honest, it's all the deluded halfwits had to cling on to.
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:06 am
by Flairon
palerider wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:04 am
Flairon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:03 am
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
Let's be honest, it's all the deluded halfwits had to cling on to.
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:48 am
by OZHAMMER
Flairon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:03 am
... than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
That’s a good point.
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:57 am
by Whiskyman
Flairon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:03 am
Whiskyman wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 12:24 pm
I take your point. But seriously why would anyone bother?
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
So you're saying, and I hope you're a Monty Python fan, the vote was split in much the same way as the inclusion of a "Very Silly" candidate affected the vote of the mainstream "Silly" party.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=mo ... &FORM=VIRE
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 12:37 pm
by Newmarket
Whiskyman wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:57 am
Flairon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:03 am
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
So you're saying, and I hope you're a Monty Python fan, the vote was split in much the same way as the inclusion of a "Very Silly" candidate affected the vote of the mainstream "Silly" party.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=mo ... &FORM=VIRE
I am very much amused as that’s exactly what I was going to add
Re: Goal of the season
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:41 pm
by Flairon
Whiskyman wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:57 am
Flairon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:03 am
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
So you're saying, and I hope you're a Monty Python fan, the vote was split in much the same way as the inclusion of a "Very Silly" candidate affected the vote of the mainstream "Silly" party.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=mo ... &FORM=VIRE
Spot on.
