Salah or Lingard for me, not because of my claret glasses, but purely for the build up, Coufal, back heel by Fornals and the finish was quite excellent.
I don't think it was goal of the season but I also don't think Lanzini's was either...both good goals....I assume though that it was the public voting.
If I had to vote for it, I would have picked Salah's goal against us.
His 1st touch was sickeningly good
Yes. Like Fornals as mentioned above, he killed the ball dead but the fact that they broke so quickly as well won it for me.
I am not saying it is rigged, but are you seriously asking that question. After all, where there is a will; there is a way...
I take your point. But seriously why would anyone bother?
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
I take your point. But seriously why would anyone bother?
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
Let's be honest, it's all the deluded halfwits had to cling on to.
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
Let's be honest, it's all the deluded halfwits had to cling on to.
I take your point. But seriously why would anyone bother?
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
So you're saying, and I hope you're a Monty Python fan, the vote was split in much the same way as the inclusion of a "Very Silly" candidate affected the vote of the mainstream "Silly" party.
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
So you're saying, and I hope you're a Monty Python fan, the vote was split in much the same way as the inclusion of a "Very Silly" candidate affected the vote of the mainstream "Silly" party.
Why does anyone fix anything? If you can bet on the outcome there is money to be made. Having said that, I rather suspect that more Spud fans were motivated to vote than Hammers, who of course had more than one goal to choose from.
So you're saying, and I hope you're a Monty Python fan, the vote was split in much the same way as the inclusion of a "Very Silly" candidate affected the vote of the mainstream "Silly" party.
