Page 4 of 7

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 3:00 pm
by BlackDiamond
Whiskyman wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 2:51 pm Spurs had a goal disallowed by VAR today so I have a question for Terry and the other conspiracy theorists.

Does this mean there is no conspiracy to favour the “big 6” or———-could it be that in a darkened, smoke filled room somewhere, a decision has been taken to exclude them from this exclusive group? :lol:
and not just any Spurs goal...a Harry Kane Spurs goal - offside by a nose

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 3:09 pm
by Whiskyman
BlackDiamond wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 3:00 pm
Whiskyman wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 2:51 pm Spurs had a goal disallowed by VAR today so I have a question for Terry and the other conspiracy theorists.

Does this mean there is no conspiracy to favour the “big 6” or———-could it be that in a darkened, smoke filled room somewhere, a decision has been taken to exclude them from this exclusive group? :lol:
and not just any Spurs goal...a Harry Kane Spurs goal - offside by a nose
So is the conspiracy dead in the water——-OR———-
Is it now only a big 5———OR————
Will a new “big 6” member be nominated ? ;)

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 3:13 pm
by Whiskyman
palerider wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 2:57 pm
Whiskyman wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 2:51 pm Spurs had a goal disallowed by VAR today so I have a question for Terry and the other conspiracy theorists.

Does this mean there is no conspiracy to favour the “big 6” or———-could it be that in a darkened, smoke filled room somewhere, a decision has been taken to exclude them from this exclusive group? :lol:
The offside situation with VAR isn't up for debate. As ridiculous as it is for lines to be drawn and waits of up to 3 minutes, sometimes to determine which part of the arm is offside, it's either offside or it isn't. It's not subjective.

Red cards are.
Of course it’s up for debate with offsides. Particularly when it’s as tight as the proverbialduck’s arse. As many pros and ex pros have mentioned when there have been such instances it is virtually impossible to ascertain precisely when the ball was played in relation to where a player’s big toe happens to be.

Hopefully Arsene Wenger’s Idea I’ll be implemented. That if any part of the body is onside that would be the deciding factor.

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 3:30 pm
by palerider
Whiskyman wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 3:13 pm
palerider wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 2:57 pm

The offside situation with VAR isn't up for debate. As ridiculous as it is for lines to be drawn and waits of up to 3 minutes, sometimes to determine which part of the arm is offside, it's either offside or it isn't. It's not subjective.

Red cards are.
Of course it’s up for debate with offsides. Particularly when it’s as tight as the proverbialduck’s arse. As many pros and ex pros have mentioned when there have been such instances it is virtually impossible to ascertain precisely when the ball was played in relation to where a player’s big toe happens to be.

Hopefully Arsene Wenger’s Idea I’ll be implemented. That if any part of the body is onside that would be the deciding factor.
I disagree. That's why they draw the lines.

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 3:36 pm
by mkhammer
Whiskyman wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 3:13 pm
palerider wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 2:57 pm

The offside situation with VAR isn't up for debate. As ridiculous as it is for lines to be drawn and waits of up to 3 minutes, sometimes to determine which part of the arm is offside, it's either offside or it isn't. It's not subjective.

Red cards are.
Of course it’s up for debate with offsides. Particularly when it’s as tight as the proverbialduck’s arse. As many pros and ex pros have mentioned when there have been such instances it is virtually impossible to ascertain precisely when the ball was played in relation to where a player’s big toe happens to be.
Yep exactly...always banged on about that, till they define the moment the ball was kicked to where the players left bollock is
it's still surmising ....Has to be a picture when the ball was first touched ..say 48mins 46.25 sec....and where the "Offside" player
was at that exact moment...but they aint bothered with all that..as it's there purely for Drama... big up dull games,have
talkin points....
Nothing these days is for the benefit of the game...was fuck all wrong with the actual playing side of it...
What this crap of a thing should be used for is to catch cheats out,not the 50/50 things,where some go and some dont.
Think we've had 5 from last 8 sending offs turned around...should be used to review that sort of thing...
Mind you it was (Balbuena against cheats) still managed to fuck that up... :lol:
Shouldn't laugh really..arguably that could have cost us a CL spot.

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 3:43 pm
by Whiskyman
mkhammer wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 3:36 pm
Whiskyman wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 3:13 pm

Of course it’s up for debate with offsides. Particularly when it’s as tight as the proverbialduck’s arse. As many pros and ex pros have mentioned when there have been such instances it is virtually impossible to ascertain precisely when the ball was played in relation to where a player’s big toe happens to be.
Yep exactly...always banged on about that, till they define the moment the ball was kicked to where the players left bollock is
it's still surmising ....Has to be a picture when the ball was first touched ..say 48mins 46.25 sec....and where the "Offside" player
was at that exact moment...but they aint bothered with all that..as it's there purely for Drama... big up dull games,have
talkin points....
Nothing these days is for the benefit of the game...was fuck all wrong with the actual playing side of it...
What this crap of a thing should be used for is to catch cheats out,not the 50/50 things,where some go and some dont.
Think we've had 5 from last 8 sending offs turned around...should be used to review that sort of thing...
Mind you it was (Balbuena against cheats) still managed to fuck that up... :lol:
Shouldn't laugh really..arguably that could have cost us a CL spot.
Balbuena’s red car d was a direct result of the idiot in the VAR room. The o field ref dinn’t even see it as a foul.

Clear and obvious errors was the original idea. Don’t see what’s wrong with that tbh.

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 4:48 pm
by ToneLoc
Whiskyman wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 2:51 pm Spurs had a goal disallowed by VAR today so I have a question for Terry and the other conspiracy theorists.

Does this mean there is no conspiracy to favour the “big 6” or———-could it be that in a darkened, smoke filled room somewhere, a decision has been taken to exclude them from this exclusive group? :lol:
Ah but there’s the “big 6” pre and post ESL.
Now the “big 6” must be as popular with the P.L and the F.A as a bacon butty in Bethlehem.

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 7:34 pm
by Newmarket
Anybody else suspicious of the City/Chelsea result ? :lol:

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 7:51 pm
by palerider
Newmarket wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 7:34 pm Anybody else suspicious of the City/Chelsea result ? :lol:
Yep.

Re: Wheres the conspiract theorys ?

Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 7:52 pm
by ToneLoc
The ESL mafia Tim.