Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.
Here we go. How very 2020 of them. And on the face of it, what's to argue with. Why shouldn't we encourage the BAMEs and mixed genders to strive for
leadership positions in all ventures including football.
And here is where the problem goes really fucking bad and real quick. Once you introduce desirable percentage targets you immediately create artificial quotas. What this means exactly is the recruitment process becomes corrupted, because the quota system is then determining the outcome instead of the normal way of using traditional methods like merit and quality.
People don't like to normally get all negative about new and trendy ideas so they say nothing. Nobody wants to be an old grump.
The fact that those ideas are often a load of old cunt and sail along unchallenged is evidence that the existing leadership isn't exactly fit for purpose either.
So will a crap idea like this be enthusiastically adopted - absolutely
BlackDiamond wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:47 am
Here we go. How very 2020 of them. And on the face of it, what's to argue with. Why shouldn't we encourage the BAMEs and mixed genders to strive for
leadership positions in all ventures including football.
And here is where the problem goes really fucking bad and real quick. Once you introduce desirable percentage targets you immediately create artificial quotas. What this means exactly is the recruitment process becomes corrupted, because the quota system is then determining the outcome instead of the normal way of using traditional methods like merit and quality.
People don't like to normally get all negative about new and trendy ideas so they say nothing. Nobody wants to be an old grump.
The fact that those ideas are often a load of old cunt and sail along unchallenged is evidence that the existing leadership isn't exactly fit for purpose either.
So will a crap idea like this be enthusiastically adopted - absolutely
Absolute b*llocks,you get a job,because you are deemed the best person for that position..This goes against what Equality(equal rights) actually stands for.
Gay monopede ginger dwarfs lives matter. There is not one gay monopede ginger dwarf in any form of coaching role within the EFL or PL. In fact I don't know if there's even been an interview.
palerider wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:55 am
Gay monopede ginger dwarfs lives matter. There is not one gay monopede ginger dwarf in any form of coaching role within the EFL or PL. In fact I don't know if there's even been an interview.
It's a disgrace !
#GMGDLM
I'm not sure their interpretation of diversity comprehensively includes the LGBTQ+ crowd. It's Women and the BAMEs. And within the later group they are primarily thinking about the Black representation, not the other dolly mixtures.
It’s complete bullshit. Not the story but the fact of it. Said all along you recruit who is best for the job, not just coz they’re a bird, disabled or of a different colour or culture. If you’re good enough, you get the gig. If you’re not, you don’t. Fuck this fuckin world
It’s complete bullshit. Not the story but the fact of it. Said all along you recruit who is best for the job, not just coz they’re a bird, disabled or of a different colour or culture. If you’re good enough, you get the gig. If you’re not, you don’t. Fuck this fuckin world.
Yes I said this on Nevs thread too. Didn’t realise there were 2 threads on it. Is it for equality?
15% of new executive appointments will be from a BAME background, with 30% female.
25% of new coaching appointments will be BAME and 10% of senior coaching appointments.
This is a fucking racist doctrine. You are selected based on colour not ability and we will also ensure over representation
Let me repeat 87% of the UK population is white and yet there is now a rule in football that says only 75% of new coaches can be white
