4-3-3 formation

[BlackDiamond]

Only just realised that I made a series of typos here Of course I mean. 433 not 443 ahhahahah glad you lot haven't ripped me over it

You guys...why don't you just edit it ? Your the author so no foul. In fact,I would alter it to 4-4-4 just for sheer bloody mindedness

[JayK]

Our problem is not formation it is pace.
We need to move the ball a lot, lot quicker and require some pace up front.

And positioning and movement. I saw a big hole right in the middle of the park, Sunday and Noble had nobody to pass to.

[JayK]

I do prefer 443 and 444 over 433 though. Just hope the refs don't notice

[bigfacemike]

How about 4141. At least it adds up! We don't get outnumbered in midfield (my main issue with 442) and it pushes Payet, Antonio et el further up the pitch.
Or how about 4231 with Feguli at 10? Or any combination with some fit players???

[hammerman69]

4 4 3 would mean a extra man for us so I'm for it, not sure about the premier league though, might wanna check ya formation numbers lol