terrya1965 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:56 am
Whiskyman wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:06 am
Football supporters want to see style over success ? Not in a million years. Football supporters want success for their clubs. They want to lord it over their mates in the pub and at work. Why do you think some Leeds fans are starting to turn against Bielsa even though they are a terrific watch for us neutrals who couldn't give a monkeys if they win or lose.?
Ask any football fan if they'd prefer to see their side grind out 1-0 wins and lift major trophies or play in a series of 3-3 end to enders and end up with an empty trophy cabinet.
Of course you want to win something over style.I am not denying that,especially if you haven't won nothing for years.We would take it.Spurs would take it it too or anyone else starved of successs.
I'm saying ,the teams that regularly win silverware like the Chelsea's want to see some style.Would Bayern Munich fans except drab Football?Nah.
They would rather see drab, winning football than any form of losing football. But that's not how it works is it ? Successful sides evolve. And as they become more successful, if they bring in more cash as a result, they can attract better , more skilful, players and, voila, you have a more skilful side.
Tuchel had to address the obvious deficiencies he inherited from the Lampard era and, quite sensibly, he started with the defence. His teams at Dortmund and PSG weren't too dull to watch by any stretch of the imagination. I don't find his Chelsea boring tbh but I can understand why some do. FFS some people say they found the Mourinho Barcelona boring. And the same has been said, on this very forum no less, about Manchester City.
At times I've been "bored" watching Man City. Sometimes when they go 2 or 3 goals up they switch off anj just play the game out. Not their fault the quality of the opposition is so gash they don't have to play at anything like their true level to win is it ? Personally I'd prefer to see teams like Tuchel's Chelsea passing the ball to each other, retaining possession, trying to find an opening, than a crash, bang, wallop outfit who whack a high ball in to a great lump like Andy Carroll at the earliest opportunity. Yes Sam, I'm talking about you and the other cunts who play that way.
I do sometimes wonder what a lot of people see as "progressive" football. I saw on one forum somewhere, might even have been this one, I can't remember, Scott Parker referred to as a "young, progressive, manager". Well, if progressive means managing a side that has scored 22 goals in 29 matches I guess he fits the bill.