Hammers Utd on talksport

[hd1]

In any case I've said in posts before many times my views on Hammers United. Unfortunately it seems that Paul, and there was one other bloke whose name I can't remember, assume people who don't kiss their collective fucking arseholes are automatically opposed to them.

Me ? Opposed to them, no. Think they're wasting their time ? Yes. But as I've said before it's their time to waste.

This is my view oh faceless one. It seems you cannot have an opinion that is both supportive on some aspects and not on others as you become a Board stooge for not totally agreeing.

It's a shame because the sentiment is there for all the right reasons, but the implementation is seriously flawed. All IMHO of course.

[Whiskyman]

In any case I've said in posts before many times my views on Hammers United. Unfortunately it seems that Paul, and there was one other bloke whose name I can't remember, assume people who don't kiss their collective fucking arseholes are automatically opposed to them.

Me ? Opposed to them, no. Think they're wasting their time ? Yes. But as I've said before it's their time to waste.

This is my view oh faceless one. It seems you cannot have an opinion that is both supportive on some aspects and not on others as you become a Board stooge for not totally agreeing.

It's a shame because the sentiment is there for all the right reasons, but the implementation is seriously flawed. All IMHO of course.

Can't disagree. The impression I've got is that unless one is 100% in agreement with everything they are doing one is against them. Which of course is total nonsense.

[terrya1965]

It was a poor effort, no doubt

But don't forget, these are 2 blokes, who have made there fortune out of Porn, in the early days it would have been with women who were in dire need.

They do not have a moral between and don't give a fuck, about anything other than money. No amount of banner waiving or committee's, will sway their way of thinking

Absolute spot on.
They have no principles or morales,as long has they are making a pound note.
MONEY IS THEIR GOD.

[Brookbonds73]

I'd like to see Jim white on the boats after a game.
I just hope he can swim.

[Whiskyman]

The letters about a drink were sent.-As were the others.All clearly in the in box my friend. Anyway I will let readers draw their own concusions.

One type of person I can't stand Paul are liars. I wouldn't normally bother responding to posts like this but I'm going to make an exception.

Let's make it clear. I received 3 personal messages from you, the first one suggesting going for a drink to discuss issues about West Ham. I replied to them but I didn't think they were sent because they still showed in my outbox, which is the issue I reported to site admin and which Newmarket referred to in his post. When I got this reply, I obviously realised you had received the ones I sent.

Your reply to the last of these messages is here
Re: W.G.C.
Sent: Sat Jul 20, 2019 5:46 pm
From: prince of wales
Recipient: Whiskyman

Cheers mate.H.U. may indeed turn out to be a waste of time.-But I am still very optimistic.Most on here predicted we would last till Easter.We now have 4300 members and are determined to make things better for our long suffering fans.Out tonight at a WGC West Ham fans wedding aniv.Will be a lot of Hammers Fans there so looking forward to it.If you ever do decide to watch an away game in one of the pubs please let me know.
Cheers.COYI.
Paul.

Unfortunately my messages to you have been deleted so I can't copy them. However I feel sure if you read what you sent to me you will agree it doesn't sound as if I was insulting you or being abusive, does it ? But, as you say, let's allow other people to draw their own conclusions. If you have the alleged "insulting" posts I sent to you post them on here. You say they are in the box so C & P them.

I can take criticism Paul but I won't accept lies about me. And on this matter, as indeed any other, I hope readers do draw their own conclusions. On that at least we can agree.

[Newmarket]

Ok lads I think it’s time to draw a line underneath this one

It doesn’t do anybody any good and it’s not healthy for the forum .
If this was playing out on KUMB these exchanges would have been deleted (and more) days ago.

At the end of the day you both (in fact ALL) of us want what’s best for West Ham United and nearly all of us wish for a change of ownership ASAP so arguing about the best way to achieve that by these means is pretty futile.

I have contacted our site IT wizard to find out if personal messages can be deleted by the sender AFTER the recipient has already received them (if that makes sense) .

[BlackDiamond]

Ok lads I think it’s time to draw a line underneath this one

It doesn’t do anybody any good and it’s not healthy for the forum .
If this was playing out on KUMB these exchanges would have been deleted (and more) days ago.

At the end of the day you both (in fact ALL) of us want what’s best for West Ham United and nearly all of us wish for a change of ownership ASAP so arguing about the best way to achieve that by these means is pretty futile.

I have contacted our site IT wizard to find out if personal messages can be deleted by the sender AFTER the recipient has already received them (if that makes sense) .

You do realise that (we) the sitting jury, have not been presented with all the forensic evidence yet - is this 2021 Justice I ask

It's a mistrial and nobody will be making a mini-series on Netflix out of this...HammersUnitedGate indeed...

[prince of wales]

Delete message
This message was deleted by its author.
by Whiskyman » Fri Mar 13, 2020 10:58 am

Delete message
This message was deleted by its author.
by Whiskyman » Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:34 pm



Delete message
This message was deleted by its author.
by Whiskyman » Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:59 pm

Re: W.G.C.
by Whiskyman » Fri Jul 19, 2019 4:26 pm

Re: W.G.C.
by Whiskyman » Sun Ju

[Whiskyman]

Ok lads I think it’s time to draw a line underneath this one

It doesn’t do anybody any good and it’s not healthy for the forum .
If this was playing out on KUMB these exchanges would have been deleted (and more) days ago.

At the end of the day you both (in fact ALL) of us want what’s best for West Ham United and nearly all of us wish for a change of ownership ASAP so arguing about the best way to achieve that by these means is pretty futile.

I have contacted our site IT wizard to find out if personal messages can be deleted by the sender AFTER the recipient has already received them (if that makes sense) .

I entirely agree. I tried PM ing you but, guess what, it just showed as a Preview and wouldn't send. So apologies for having to post on the thread again. But I am happy for others to judge if the reply I got sounds like a reply to someone who had been insulted.

Viel gluck.

[mkhammer]

My take is,there's nothing wrong with a good heated discussion,and having opposing views...lots of us have a slightly
different take on things...what we'do,whats best whats not....end result you agree to disagree..shake hands (as much as you
can on a forum).. ,,and hopefully with a little compromise and understanding in there.
This forum allows a lot of that,others don't and are censored..I know what I personally prefer.

With Andy,thought he was good...sometimes being polite putting your case calmly and eloquently,gets you further
along in your objective...that all the forceful ranting ...need to approach from all angles...Good Cop/Bad Cop.....

Sugo would have seen and been involved in a lot of shit over the years..stuff most of us don't see in our lives,they're gonna be
pretty thick skinned...but Pressure always tells in the end,why would you be wealthy and spend your life being unhappy,
and getting grief...constantly.....constantly is the key.