Page 1 of 2

City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:22 am
by palerider
Farcical ?

Law ridiculous ?

You judge.

But Dean Smith was sent off for complaining and two yellow cards. Rodri was 10 yards offside when the ball was played forward. Mings chested it down and Rodri came from behind to rob him but Smith thought it was a clear foul on Jack Grealish.

:lol:

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:29 am
by Dagger
it was a disgrace but MOTD said its the rules

the rules are a fucking disgrace

Dean Smith blowing up was worth it though

and while we are on it why didn't we get that penalty against WBA VAR my arse

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:35 am
by Dwayne Pipes
Fuck Villa ,should have been fucking relegated after that Whippet fuckers “goal” that never was.
Bunch of diving cunts can fuck off for all I care .

Brummie cunts.

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:41 am
by palerider
Dwayne Pipes wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:35 am Fuck Villa ,should have been fucking relegated after that Whippet fuckers “goal” that never was.
Bunch of diving cunts can fuck off for all I care .

Brummie cunts.
Spot on.

They bring simulation to a different level. The greasy cunt with the head band gets away with it so much, the rest think why not ?

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:18 am
by palerider
Dagger wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:29 am it was a disgrace but MOTD said its the rules

the rules are a fucking disgrace

Dean Smith blowing up was worth it though

and while we are on it why didn't we get that penalty against WBA VAR my arse
Unbelievable the penalty wasn't given. I've been trying not to have West Ham specs on for other dodgy decisions this season but that one was bewildering.

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:24 am
by Whiskyman
Rodri was coming back fr5om an offside position. So what ? Mings tried to play the ball and by doing so played Rodri onside. If a goal can be chalked off because a forward's boot size is one bigger than the defender's then let's see a bit of balance the other way round to even it up.

Crap defending by Mings imo.

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:30 am
by jameskel
Thats it, Mings played the ball, does not matter where you are

As for Grealish, would love him in our team

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:14 pm
by Whiskyman
palerider wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:18 am
Dagger wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:29 am it was a disgrace but MOTD said its the rules

the rules are a fucking disgrace

Dean Smith blowing up was worth it though

and while we are on it why didn't we get that penalty against WBA VAR my arse
Unbelievable the penalty wasn't given. I've been trying not to have West Ham specs on for other dodgy decisions this season but that one was bewildering.
It looks like the criteria for penalties has been changed again. That penalty would have been given a few weeks ago. There have been one or two others I've seen as well. Looks like the "clear & obvious" thingy is coming to the fore again. Shame that's not the case with offsides which seem to be the ones that take forever to sort out.

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:14 pm
by only1salty
Dwayne Pipes wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:35 am Fuck Villa ,should have been fucking relegated after that Whippet fuckers “goal” that never was.
Bunch of diving cunts can fuck off for all I care .

Brummie cunts.
Couldn't agree more. Coordinated diving across the entire team

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:15 pm
by Whiskyman
only1salty wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:14 pm
Dwayne Pipes wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:35 am Fuck Villa ,should have been fucking relegated after that Whippet fuckers “goal” that never was.
Bunch of diving cunts can fuck off for all I care .

Brummie cunts.
Couldn't agree more. Coordinated diving across the entire team
Have they taken on Eddie Howe in some sort of consultancy role ? ;)