City's 'offside' goal

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
palerider
Posts: 10762
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:35 am
Location: Huish Episcopi
x 181
x 406

City's 'offside' goal

Post by palerider »

Farcical ?

Law ridiculous ?

You judge.

But Dean Smith was sent off for complaining and two yellow cards. Rodri was 10 yards offside when the ball was played forward. Mings chested it down and Rodri came from behind to rob him but Smith thought it was a clear foul on Jack Grealish.

:lol:
New striker ?..... I'm down to my last 970 million.

User avatar
Dagger
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:37 pm
x 22

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by Dagger »

it was a disgrace but MOTD said its the rules

the rules are a fucking disgrace

Dean Smith blowing up was worth it though

and while we are on it why didn't we get that penalty against WBA VAR my arse

User avatar
Dwayne Pipes
Posts: 4590
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:46 pm
x 85
x 675

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by Dwayne Pipes »

Fuck Villa ,should have been fucking relegated after that Whippet fuckers “goal” that never was.
Bunch of diving cunts can fuck off for all I care .

Brummie cunts.

User avatar
palerider
Posts: 10762
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:35 am
Location: Huish Episcopi
x 181
x 406

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by palerider »

Dwayne Pipes wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:35 am Fuck Villa ,should have been fucking relegated after that Whippet fuckers “goal” that never was.
Bunch of diving cunts can fuck off for all I care .

Brummie cunts.
Spot on.

They bring simulation to a different level. The greasy cunt with the head band gets away with it so much, the rest think why not ?
New striker ?..... I'm down to my last 970 million.

User avatar
palerider
Posts: 10762
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:35 am
Location: Huish Episcopi
x 181
x 406

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by palerider »

Dagger wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:29 am it was a disgrace but MOTD said its the rules

the rules are a fucking disgrace

Dean Smith blowing up was worth it though

and while we are on it why didn't we get that penalty against WBA VAR my arse
Unbelievable the penalty wasn't given. I've been trying not to have West Ham specs on for other dodgy decisions this season but that one was bewildering.
New striker ?..... I'm down to my last 970 million.

User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 12584
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 76
x 496

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by Whiskyman »

Rodri was coming back fr5om an offside position. So what ? Mings tried to play the ball and by doing so played Rodri onside. If a goal can be chalked off because a forward's boot size is one bigger than the defender's then let's see a bit of balance the other way round to even it up.

Crap defending by Mings imo.
TRADITION--Just because we've always done it like this doesn't mean it's not incredibly SILLY

User avatar
jameskel
Posts: 2107
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 11:22 pm
x 1
x 95

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by jameskel »

Thats it, Mings played the ball, does not matter where you are

As for Grealish, would love him in our team
Taans can fuck right off

User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 12584
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 76
x 496

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by Whiskyman »

palerider wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:18 am
Dagger wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:29 am it was a disgrace but MOTD said its the rules

the rules are a fucking disgrace

Dean Smith blowing up was worth it though

and while we are on it why didn't we get that penalty against WBA VAR my arse
Unbelievable the penalty wasn't given. I've been trying not to have West Ham specs on for other dodgy decisions this season but that one was bewildering.
It looks like the criteria for penalties has been changed again. That penalty would have been given a few weeks ago. There have been one or two others I've seen as well. Looks like the "clear & obvious" thingy is coming to the fore again. Shame that's not the case with offsides which seem to be the ones that take forever to sort out.
TRADITION--Just because we've always done it like this doesn't mean it's not incredibly SILLY

User avatar
only1salty
Posts: 443
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:33 pm
x 1
x 76

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by only1salty »

Dwayne Pipes wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:35 am Fuck Villa ,should have been fucking relegated after that Whippet fuckers “goal” that never was.
Bunch of diving cunts can fuck off for all I care .

Brummie cunts.
Couldn't agree more. Coordinated diving across the entire team

User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 12584
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 76
x 496

Re: City's 'offside' goal

Post by Whiskyman »

only1salty wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:14 pm
Dwayne Pipes wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:35 am Fuck Villa ,should have been fucking relegated after that Whippet fuckers “goal” that never was.
Bunch of diving cunts can fuck off for all I care .

Brummie cunts.
Couldn't agree more. Coordinated diving across the entire team
Have they taken on Eddie Howe in some sort of consultancy role ? ;)
TRADITION--Just because we've always done it like this doesn't mean it's not incredibly SILLY

Post Reply