Lanzini

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
Newmarket
Posts: 18918
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 10:03 pm
x 2353
x 3422

Re: Lanzini

Post by Newmarket »

mkhammer wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:23 pm
Newmarket wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 5:47 pm

Who’s apology was that ? As it wasn’t Lanzini’s.
Shouldn't have put the quote marks up mate...was just generalizing ....it's the Token thing people that think the shit we're
going thru with Lockdowns/Tiers etc is not meant for them, put out...Footballers,Actors..Singers,Wealthy Bods..so on.

Was very close tho....almost like they have a template to use.
He’s only sorry cos he got caught . Personally I’m more concerned about the fact he’s friendly with Spuds .

Even Argentinian Spuds .

At least Noble knows what i mean .
Bring back Jonathon !

User avatar
ToneLoc
Posts: 9658
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:21 pm
x 223
x 345

Re: Lanzini

Post by ToneLoc »

He should receive 100 lashes.
Drinking with Spuds?

Joking aside...... I don't think we can wholly pin this on some P.L footballers being thick as a cement sandwich.
Selfish, self-regarding cunts badly needing a reality check on morals and ethics is my take.
So then Sky, BT, BBC? How about it? You've spent the last year lecturing us plebs on morals and ethics.............................................
Fancy calling your only son "Barnestoneworth"
He's got another name....
Yeah....."United"

User avatar
Newmarket
Posts: 18918
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 10:03 pm
x 2353
x 3422

Re: Lanzini

Post by Newmarket »

ToneLoc wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:46 pm He should receive 100 lashes.
Drinking with Spuds?

Joking aside......
I wasn’t joking .
Bring back Jonathon !

User avatar
Dolfo
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 1:31 pm
x 118
x 50

Re: Lanzini

Post by Dolfo »

BlackDiamond wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 12:59 pm

It might be better to never see anybody at any time ever, but generally speaking, people that preach self-isolation have never actually done it themselves...
It's not about self isolation, you only do that if you test positive.

It's about abiding by the rules like the rest of us.

User avatar
ToneLoc
Posts: 9658
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:21 pm
x 223
x 345

Re: Lanzini

Post by ToneLoc »

Newmarket wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:55 pm
ToneLoc wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:46 pm He should receive 100 lashes.
Drinking with Spuds?

Joking aside......
I wasn’t joking .
I had a feeling you wouldn't be
Fancy calling your only son "Barnestoneworth"
He's got another name....
Yeah....."United"

User avatar
Brookbonds73
Posts: 10950
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 2:34 am
x 1771
x 2848

Re: Lanzini

Post by Brookbonds73 »

Personally being in the same house warrants a good hiding, but partying with the cunts, well he needs setting on fire.
It's blasphemy of the highest order.
Love a cup of Rosey I do.

User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 19505
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 551
x 2416

Re: Lanzini

Post by Whiskyman »

Dolfo wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 7:05 pm
BlackDiamond wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 12:59 pm

It might be better to never see anybody at any time ever, but generally speaking, people that preach self-isolation have never actually done it themselves...
It's not about self isolation, you only do that if you test positive.

It's about abiding by the rules like the rest of us.
But playing devil’s advocate for a minute. Footballers are tested on a very regular basis as I understand it. And if they are, and are negative, is there a problem ?

And can any of us honestly say, hand on heart, we’ve never bent any rules? My driving licence alone tells everyone that I have. :lol:

And let’s not go down the tax returns and “cash in hand” route. ;)
Why Is There Only One Monopolies Commission. Isn't That A Monopoly?

User avatar
hd1
Posts: 2230
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 10:28 pm
Location: Lost, looking for who we used to be
x 1353
x 510

Re: Lanzini

Post by hd1 »

This is nothing to do with whether anyone has broken any rules, ever. It is about privileged footballers ignoring the law because they think they are above it because they are being tested regularly and can easily afford to pay any fine. They are basically sticking two fingers up to those who see them as role models (kids and simple adults).

User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 19505
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 551
x 2416

Re: Lanzini

Post by Whiskyman »

hd1 wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 9:06 pm This is nothing to do with whether anyone has broken any rules, ever. It is about privileged footballers ignoring the law because they think they are above it because they are being tested regularly and can easily afford to pay any fine. They are basically sticking two fingers up to those who see them as role models (kids and simple adults).
Breaking the rules ? Ignoring the law ? I wasn't aware there was any difference.
Why Is There Only One Monopolies Commission. Isn't That A Monopoly?

User avatar
hd1
Posts: 2230
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 10:28 pm
Location: Lost, looking for who we used to be
x 1353
x 510

Re: Lanzini

Post by hd1 »

Whiskyman wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 10:19 pm
hd1 wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 9:06 pm This is nothing to do with whether anyone has broken any rules, ever. It is about privileged footballers ignoring the law because they think they are above it because they are being tested regularly and can easily afford to pay any fine. They are basically sticking two fingers up to those who see them as role models (kids and simple adults).
Breaking the rules ? Ignoring the law ? I wasn't aware there was any difference.
There isnt

Post Reply