Neville Bartos wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 2:18 pm
The question isn't really is Tarkowski an upgrade on what we have? That's probably a yes.
The question is are we going to make an offer that's likely to be accepted?
I'm reading we've offered anywhere between £20m, no chance, and £27m, which still seems short. He's a key player for Burnley, still has 2 years on his contract, and at 27 should be in his prime.
Is Tarkowski an upgrade on Diop & Ogbonna ? Don't see it tbh. And he wouldn't be brought in as a back up. Illogical.
I think if you watched our recent game against them, he was head and shoulders above Diop & Ogbonna. Proper nasty defender which tbh is probably what we need.
One game though mate.
Why Is There Only One Monopolies Commission. Isn't That A Monopoly?
Neville Bartos wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 2:18 pm
The question isn't really is Tarkowski an upgrade on what we have? That's probably a yes.
The question is are we going to make an offer that's likely to be accepted?
I'm reading we've offered anywhere between £20m, no chance, and £27m, which still seems short. He's a key player for Burnley, still has 2 years on his contract, and at 27 should be in his prime.
He doesn't want to come according to ex.
If the wages are good he'll come. That said, I realise a £2m gaff in Chigwell is no match for the societal elegance of living in Burnley, but pound notes have a way of adjusting attitudes
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.
I think if you watched our recent game against them, he was head and shoulders above Diop & Ogbonna. Proper nasty defender which tbh is probably what we need.
One game though mate.
Indeed, but you seen Diop in today’s game.
It’s not what you do it is the way that you do it.
True. But I'd be willing to wager Diop goes on to have a better career than Tarkowski. I guess my point is really that central defence shouldn't be out main priority when they glaring weakness is at full back and of course if/when Rice leaves holding midfield.
Why Is There Only One Monopolies Commission. Isn't That A Monopoly?
Towie wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:40 pm
Indeed, but you seen Diop in today’s game.
True. But I'd be willing to wager Diop goes on to have a better career than Tarkowski. I guess my point is really that central defence shouldn't be out main priority when they glaring weakness is at full back and of course if/when Rice leaves holding midfield.
Now that I do agree on.
It’s not what you do it is the way that you do it.
Phook me lads ,why would Tarko want come to a club with owners like the dildo Bros and a manager who is Phookin useless. Take my word for it ,he will be staying put at a Turf Moor.
alfie wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 5:10 pm
Phook me lads ,why would Tarko want come to a club with owners like the dildo Bros and a manager who is Phookin useless. Take my word for it ,he will be staying put at a Turf Moor.
